No. 21-789

Casey Benton v. Mary Bradley, as Administrator of the Estate of Troy Robinson, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: clearly-established-law constitutional-rights deadly-force excessive-force fourth-amendment law-enforcement qualified-immunity taser-deployment tennessee-v-garner
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a police officer is entitled to qualified immunity for deploying a taser to stop a fleeing person on top of an eight-foot wall

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The issue in this case is whether a police officer who deployed a taser to stop a fleeing person on top of an eight-foot wall is entitled to qualified immunity. The fleeing person, who the officer had reason to believe might have a weapon and who was about to escape into a residential community, died when he fell off the wall. Relying on Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), which held that a police officer violated the Fourth Amendment when he shot in the head a person he was “reasonably sure” was not armed, the Eleventh Circuit held that the officer was not entitled to qualified immunity because, under clearly established law, the officer unlawfully used deadly force by deploying the taser. In the alternative, the Eleventh Circuit held that, even disregarding Garner, qualified immunity was unavailable because the use of the taser was obviously unlawful. The questions presented are: 1. Did the Eleventh Circuit define clearly established law at too high a level of generality in assessing whether any reasonable officer would have known that deploying the taser constituted use of excessive force? 2. Did the Eleventh Circuit err in holding that under clearly established law any reasonable officer would have known that deploying the taser constituted use of excessive force? ii 3. Did the Eleventh Circuit err in its alternative holding that the officer was not entitled to qualified immunity because his use of force was so obviously unconstitutional that any reasonable officer would have known it was unlawful? iii RULE 14(B) STATEMENT The parties in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals were appellant Officer Casey Benton, who is a police officer with the DeKalb County Police Department, appellee Mary Jo Bradley, in her capacity as administrator of Troy Robinson’s estate, and R.B., T.B., J.B. and G.B., Robinson’s minor children. The following is a list of all directly

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-14
Reply of petitioner Casey Benton filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-29
Brief of respondents Mary Bradley, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Casey Benton
F. Andrew Hessick III — Petitioner
F. Andrew Hessick III — Petitioner
Mary Bradley, et al.
Sidney Leighton Moore IIIThe Moore Law Firm, P.C., Respondent
Sidney Leighton Moore IIIThe Moore Law Firm, P.C., Respondent