No. 21-8037
Larry Blakney v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process electronic-privacy fourth-amendment privacy probable-cause search-and-seizure standing traffic-stop warrantless-search
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in allowing the warrantless surveillance and search of the petitioner's cell, which violated his Fourth Amendment rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | (hy) Wiy AGE THE Complex wAhEN T. Bacar allows he 7 KE pes sone LAROm Blakey 7 Re EXEC onzonll uy Sueyeriiaaye THDUL}4 aw TVEGA\ TATEMEDTION AT TRE FEDEC A MENZOEY OF BUTNER Ai RETA(g TO THE Fader THOT HE'S THE Kee a Ok THE DESEON ,TNSTEAD of Pam StOPTAA THE Hoersyuile Q if | POltee AND THE CouUeT TAaTS AUTHO{TZrH 4 HE Suu es ll OA Ge Ih pues
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent