No. 21-927

Donald Clinton Crabtree v. Christine Crabtree

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2021-12-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: 1st-amendment due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment freedom-of-expression gender-bias gender-discrimination judicial-misconduct religious-expression
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Judge Monet Pincus violate the 1st Amendment protection of freedom of expression and generally condemn religious expression of men?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did Judge Monet Pincus violate the Ist Amendment protection of freedom of expression and generally condemn religious expression of men? II. Did the South Carolina Trial Court err in facilitating divorce of Washington State residents? III. Did the Judge George McFadden ignore : substantial exonerating evidence in support of Husband at the beginning of litigation and fail to render him due process? IV. Did the Court ignore its own psychological reports and expert testimony and wrongly assign : credibility to the Wife? V. Did the Court convert issues, conflate minimize salient facts and construct findings in order to inappropriately assign credibility to the Wife? VI. Do the findings of Judge Monet Pincus | demonstrate religious persecution, abuse of power in order to exercise prejudice and ignore torts against partnership obligations? VII. Does Judge Monet Pincus bring discredit to the : judiciary by manifest gender prejudice and malfeasance? 1. Does Judge Monet Pincus substitute hearsay regarding Husband’s childhood in order to mischaracterize findings regarding pornography? ii 2. Does Judge Monet Pincus substitute hearsay regarding Husband’s childhood in order to _ mischaracterize findings regarding objectification of women? 3. Does Judge Monet Pincus mischaracterize findings regarding Husband’s use of religion? VIII. Did the Court Facilitate the Wife’s Construction of Desertion of the Husband? IX. Did Judge Monet Pincus violate 14th Amendment equal application of the law? ; X. Did the Guardian Ad Litem, James Stoddard, manifest bias, and do his actions and assignment by Judge George McFaddin indicate collusion? XI. Did the Court err in awarding custody of the children to the Mother? ;

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-28
Reply of petitioner Donald C. Crabtree filed.
2022-01-18
Brief of respondent Christine Renee Crabtree in opposition filed.
2021-12-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 21, 2022 to February 22, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 22, 2022.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Christine Crabtree
Marian D. NettlesNettles Turbeville & Reddeck, Respondent
Christine Renee Crabtree
Marian D. NettlesNettles Turbeville and Reddeck, Respondent
Marian D. NettlesNettles Turbeville and Reddeck, Respondent
Donald C. Crabtree
Donald Clinton Crabtree — Petitioner
Donald Clinton Crabtree — Petitioner