No. 21-98

Frank C. Warner v. Miguel Cardona, Secretary of Education

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: circuit-confusion civil-procedure contract contract-enforcement debt-collection economic-policy legal-standard promissory-note statute-of-frauds
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a fully legible Promissory Note (Contract) required to collect on a debt?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Circuit Confusion exists in the matter of Promissory Notes. This Court must resolve this issue and set one standard for all 50 states. Failure to do so may lead to the economic confusion in the 1600’s that led England to create the Statute of Frauds. . This issue is: ~ 7 “Ts a fully legible Promissory Note (Contract) required to collect on a debt?” “If a Promissory Note is not required to collect on a debt what document substitutes for the terms and conditions to enforce collection of the loan?”

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Frank C. Warner
Frank C. Warner — Petitioner
Frank C. Warner — Petitioner
Miguel Cardona, Secretary of Education
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent