No. 21-982
Timothy O. Markland v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure debt-collection default-judgment due-process extrinsic-evidence service-of-process statute-of-limitations time-bar
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether rigid invocation of the non-extrinsic evidence rule denies due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether rigid invocation of the non-extrinsic evidence rule denies due process when a debt collection company obtains a default judgment and then waits to act on that judgment until the alleged debtor is time-barred from challenging the service of process. 2. Whether due process requires courts to use discretion in determining the need for extrinsic evidence.
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent Asset Acceptance Corp. to respond filed.
2022-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 9, 2022)
Attorneys
Asset Acceptance Corp.
Scott F. Lehman — LSL Latham-Steele-Lehman, Respondent
Scott F. Lehman — LSL Latham-Steele-Lehman, Respondent
Timothy Markland
Traci L. Soderstrom — Soderstrom & Associates, Petitioner
Traci L. Soderstrom — Soderstrom & Associates, Petitioner