No. 22-1011
Tony Holt v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 4th-amendment appellate-court circuit-split civil-rights due-process evidentiary-standard illinois-v-gates judicial-precedent probable-cause standing
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Appellate Court's bright-line rule on probable cause violate Illinois v. Gates?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does the Appellate Court’s bright-line rule on probable cause, which presumes that information from a purported victim is inherently reliable, violate the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. Gates, 462 US. 213 (1983)? Does the Appellate Court’s bright-line rule on probable cause create a circuit split amongst federal and state courts and set Illinois courts at odds with the federal courts regarding the establishment of probable cause?
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-04-27
Waiver of right of respondents The City of Chicago, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2023)
2023-02-07
Application (22A708) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until April 14, 2023.
2023-02-02
Application (22A708) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 28, 2023 to April 14, 2023, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
The City of Chicago, et al.
Myriam Zreczny Kasper — City of Chicago Department of Law, Respondent
Myriam Zreczny Kasper — City of Chicago Department of Law, Respondent
Tony Holt
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner