| 21-1431 |
Robert M. Kerr, Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
GVR |
Amici (6)Relisted (3) |
circuit-split civil-rights due-process medicaid medicaid-act private-right-of-action privately-enforceable-rights section-1983 spending-clause standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether Spending Clause statutes give rise to privately enforceable rights under § 1983 |
| 22-1001 |
NST Global, LLC, dba SB Tactical v. Sig Sauer Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act burden-of-proof due-process federal-circuit federal-circuit-rule-36 inter-partes-review patent-construction patent-preamble patent-validity |
Whether the Federal Circuit's affirmance of the PTAB's decision on preamble construction impermissibly shifts the burden to invalidate a patent from t… |
| 22-1003 |
Mucio Ramirez v. Christopher Martin |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-rights excessive-force fourth-amendment graham-standard graham-v-connor police-brutality police-misconduct qualified-immunity reasonable-force use-of-force |
Whether Petitioner's initial non-compliance followed by surrender permitted Respondent to reject the then-existing circumstances and slam Petitioner's… |
| 22-1004 |
Kurt Garrison v. City of Ottawa, Kansas, et al. |
Kansas |
Denied |
|
constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-bias prejudice procedural-due-process professional-engineering right-to-trial-by-jury standard-of-review substantive-due-process |
Whether substantive due process was denied |
| 22-1010 |
Robert A. Heghmann, et ux. v. Djamel Hafiani, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
automatic-stay bankruptcy-court-jurisdiction bankruptcy-jurisdiction circuit-split compensatory-damages district-court district-court-jurisdiction punitive-damages status-quo |
Does the Bankruptcy Court or the U.S. District Court, or both, have jurisdiction to entertain a complaint filed by a debtor seeking compensatory and p… |
| 22-1011 |
Tony Holt v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al. |
Illinois |
Denied |
Response Waived |
4th-amendment appellate-court circuit-split civil-rights due-process evidentiary-standard illinois-v-gates judicial-precedent probable-cause standing |
Does the Appellate Court's bright-line rule on probable cause violate Illinois v. Gates? |
| 22-1044 |
Jose Isrrael Gonzalez-Vega v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
None |
|
| 22-1050 |
Cedric Epple v. Albany Unified School District, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 administrative-actions civil-rights due-process exhaustion federal-court judicial-exhaustion ninth-circuit section-1983 state-court-remedies summary-reversal |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in requiring exhaustion of state court remedies for a Section 1983 claim |
| 22-1076 |
Online Merchants Guild v. Nicolas Maduros, Director, California Department of Tax and Free Administration |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
cic-services-llc-v-internal-revenue-service comity-doctrine direct-marketing-association-v-brohl federal-jurisdiction information-demands online-merchants putative-taxpayer state-tax-demands tax-injunction-act third-party |
Whether the Tax Injunction Act applies differently based on whether the plaintiff is a putative taxpayer or a third-party |
| 22-1086 |
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva v. Department of Veteran Affairs, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeals civil-procedure court-authority due-process federal-courts federal-rules-civil-procedure jurisdiction procedural-defect service-of-process standing summons-requirements |
Did both the U.S. District Courts have a right to issue any ruling if the defendant was not properly served? |
| 22-1088 |
John T. Morris v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accumulated-knowledge article-1-section-2 constitutional-interpretation election-integrity first-amendment frequent-elections political-rights redistricting voter-participation voting-rights |
Are frequent elections implied in Article 1, Section 2 Clause 1 of the United States Constitution that were meant by the Framers of the Constitution t… |
| 22-1098 |
David Parsons Demarest v. Town of Underhill, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
due-process federal-court-jurisdiction federal-courts property-rights retroactive-application retroactivity statute-of-limitations takings takings-litigation |
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in refusing to give retroactive effect to Knick v. Township of Scott and Wilkins v. United States |
| 22-1103 |
Edward Bronson v. Securities and Exchange Commission |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review circuit-court-order civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-sanctions due-process injunctive-relief penalties punitive-sanctions standing statutory-penalties supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the Summary Order of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit conflicts with decisions of this Court |
| 22-1108 |
Reuben Haley v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review burden-of-proof civil-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-standard standard-of-review summary-judgment |
Whether the grant of summary judgment against petitioner was error? |
| 22-347 |
Diece-Lisa Industries, Inc. v. Disney Store USA, LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
expressive-work first-amendment intellectual-property likelihood-of-confusion reverse-confusion trademark-infringement trademark-law |
Does the First Amendment provide an infringer blanket immunity for trademark infringement across all categories of goods so long as they can claim the… |
| 22-534 |
Theresa Eagleson, Director, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services v. St. Anthony Hospital, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
GVR |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
42-usc-1983 contract-enforcement managed-care medicaid private-rights section-1983 spending-clause statutory-duty timely-payment |
Whether Spending Clause legislation, including Section u-2(f), can impliedly create private rights enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| 22-598 |
Arthur Bedrosian v. United States, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-penalty civil-procedure due-process foreign-account foreign-account-reporting irs objective-standard statutory-interpretation subjective-standard tax willful-violation willfulness |
Whether willfulness under 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5)(C) should be determined according to a subjective, rather than objective, standard that focuses on an… |
| 22-607 |
Noah Nagy, Warden v. Jimmy Baugh |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
actual-innocence constitutional-error criminal-procedure federal-review habeas-corpus new-evidence sixth-amendment standard-of-review statutory-interpretation |
Did the Sixth Circuit misapprehend § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii)'s standard by granting habeas relief to Jimmy Baugh when the newly discovered evidence at issue… |
| 22-636 |
S. S. v. United States, et al. |
Armed Forces |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
court-martial criminal-appeal evidentiary-review in-camera-review intervention-rights jaffee-v-redmond m.r.e.-513 military-evidence military-rule-of-evidence psychotherapist-patient-privilege psychotherapist-privilege upjohn-co-v-united-states |
Whether diagnoses and treatments are privileged under the military's privilege |
| 22-759 |
Michael Gramins v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
appellate-review civil-rights fraud fraud-statutes legal-interpretation materiality negotiating-position statutory-interpretation transaction-disclosure transaction-terms |
Whether, for purposes of the federal fraud statutes, misstatements are immaterial when they pertain only to a party's negotiating position and all ter… |
| 22-769 |
Weixing V. Wang v. Brandywyne Common Condominium |
New Hampshire |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidence-rules federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-misconduct standing summary-judgment |
Solely-with-lies-and-fabricated-numbers-on-paper-without-evidence-how-can-petitioner-be-ordered-to-pay |
| 22-815 |
Victor B. Skaar v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
administrative-law all-writs-act class-action exhaustion exhaustion-requirement federal-circuit injunctive-relief judicial-jurisdiction statutory-authority veterans-affairs veterans-court |
Does the Veterans Court have statutory or inherent authority to include veterans whose individual claims are not yet exhausted in a class seeking inju… |
| 22-816 |
The School of the Ozarks, Inc., dba College of the Ozarks v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (10) |
administrative-law administrative-procedure-act article-iii-standing enforcement executive-order fair-housing-act gender-identity notice-and-comment regulatory-enforcement standing |
Whether a notice-and-comment violation, on its own, can establish Article III standing for a regulated entity within the applicable zone of interests |
| 22-827 |
Carlos Herrera, Daniel Sanchez, and Anthony Ray Baca v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge post-trial-motion rule-12 waiver |
Whether a facial constitutional challenge to a criminal statute under the Commerce Clause can be brought by post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Cr… |
| 22-844 |
Hamid Akhavan and Ruben Weigand v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination exceptional-circumstances remote-testimony sixth-amendment trial-procedure |
Whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment is violated by denying a criminal defendant the right to cross-examine a key prosecution witne… |
| 22-846 |
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Reginald Kirtz |
Third Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (2)Relisted (3) |
civil-liability civil-procedure fair-credit-reporting-act federal-jurisdiction federal-law sovereign-immunity statutory-interpretation waiver |
Whether the civil-liability provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seg., unequivocally and unambiguously waive the sovereign i… |
| 22-865 |
Mobilize the Message, LLC, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
campaign-finance campaign-material civil-rights content-based-regulation content-based-restriction first-amendment free-speech independent-contractor independent-contractors political-canvassing political-speech speech-regulation |
Whether regulating canvassing and the delivery of printed material based on that speech's content, function, or purpose implicates the First Amendment |
| 22-874 |
Andrew Meisner, Oakland County Treasurer, et al. v. Tawanda Hall, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-law due-process equitable-title foreclosure municipal-law property-rights surplus-proceeds takings takings-clause tax-delinquency tax-foreclosure |
Whether foreclosing on a home for the nonpayment of taxes constitutes a violation of the federal Takings Clause whenever the home is worth more than t… |
| 22-885 |
South Carolina v. Angela D. Brewer |
South Carolina |
Denied |
|
confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure expert-testimony forensic-evidence forensic-pathology melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts ohio-v-clark sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence testimonial-statements |
Whether lab results requested not by law enforcement but by a forensic pathologist to assist in making a routine cause of death determination are test… |
| 22-887 |
Rogelio Albino Diaz-Tomas v. North Carolina |
North Carolina |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process indefinite-postponement north-carolina plea-bargaining prosecution-postponement speedy-trial |
Whether the indefinite postponement of prosecutions in North Carolina, for the purpose of coercing guilty pleas, violates the Speedy Trial Clause or t… |
| 22-890 |
Quad Graphics, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue |
North Carolina |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
commerce-clause constitutional-interpretation due-process interstate-sales judicial-precedent out-of-state-sales precedent state-courts state-taxation supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the North Carolina Supreme Court was correct that state courts and taxing authorities no longer must follow Dilworth because this Court has im… |
| 22-994 |
Wall Street Apartments, LLC, et al. v. All Star Property Management, LLC, et al. |
Washington |
Denied |
|
access-to-court appellate-procedure constitutional-rights court-hearing decision-based-on-record due-process equal-protection judicial-review meaningful-hearing scrutiny-of-state-court-proceedings |
Whether the Court of Appeals violated the constitutional rights of Appellants to due-process, equal-protection, meaningful-hearing, decision-based-on-… |
| 22-996 |
Tawanda Hall, et al. v. Andrew Meisner, Oakland County Treasurer, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-forfeiture civil-procedure civil-punishment constitutional-law due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines excessive-fines-clause property-forfeiture takings tax-foreclosure |
Whether the forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt plus interest, penalties, and costs is a fine within the meaning of th… |
| 22-997 |
Andrew Lewis v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
|
criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-evidence medical-testimony prejudice-analysis standard-of-review strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-counsel |
Whether the TCCA failed to conduct the 'probing and fact-specific' prejudice analysis required by Strickland v. Washington |