Whether the U.S. Department of Justice and the federal court violated the Consent Decree by taking further steps in the prosecution under Art. 5(b), Section 2 of the Merrick Garland Claim?

No question identified. : () Dep THe Zur \holaled WE Us. Veprk Ment oF belive and We Fede Louil Level RogT “Longe Decree” By Taken, FeelHer STERS aN’ THE. PROSECLECON Under ART. SHB, SEDRR ATE oF TE Merl Clem? (Page No. ID) . DDD The “Tory kiww TE Brensx FActLxy Weg TA VIDLAltan oF A BRoK En Mandalay Lup Rao “Conse DECREE” bas THe Uc LEPRRTMENT oF Asie fad Te edeRAL Zar LoIceRNng Fe Thal, TLE-RROCESS, an Zon SET Een py. oo) itencd EO iE ORDER LACIRINE OE PeRATE oF THE Whi oF Relabe eats, (Revewnllic usc 12 WDD THe Deteae atbenkcus VolaTicl Hes Call oF oF RICE Wellrnlatills valle LA-Zonlel IDE 30° ATIORNEL OFFICE ZouRTHOUSE, 30D wreHea Cie NEW Teer, La Tong, () fel WZ 9 RC) (a CASES | | QU< V. Feleppr, ZF 3d 644 65! ('%. Zeco) Zolle Vi BenkeFiceal aNdx Zong 337 Us. F4] BYE 4T (1949), C/A RS. 14? 30, | : Ole, ART S46 | ny ® OS Tanpfkrp 616 FA 1301, 1103(Il Ze 140) (1 Beall i Mule, 207 US. 619, 637 113, 5 He 22, (32 74 (LL s. Ve LoughWeR, & 3 73478 (Tce Di ——— SSS. ee] a Ll