Whether the warrantless installation and use of a GPS tracking device on a vehicle violates the Fourth Amendment

No question identified. : Questlan(S) Presented rankve. a the united States courtof Appeals prewaus| alec{sJah + aralingGPS tracking ‘ucrarnd ancl in cont let wauith alotien cout of appeate anal Supreme caurt? (Q)was this conth'ot regarchina EPS ID AhEs sued ok any courts inthe united States © (2) Sell the ofthicers Wiblated MR. Ealmoacds fourcth_am= endment ri Ake when the officers physically intrucled an Me infatmattor fy snstallieg abs thu witpouta warrantanol irs! foutMR. Eolmands. Garnse 97k (Wives R. Janes, case already retroactively applied? CS) 8 | Eas sl ocr CLbuindd from am GPS cleitee ne this result ofl ine Pectlvel assistance of counse/% ©) did foirfoax county police ‘Heoally enterec! the Sta ean abnaithaut 2 sinivant asa physeallyite= Ucledl_o b'taner cat to ‘nstoll a GPS cleweoe EV) hol this courtacdress GPS tracks abana _a persak Dale rgransner at He care 7 FOE Cohtin feet