No. 22-7595

Arnoldo Navarette v. Vincent Horton, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment trial
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-06-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when his defense attorney failed to present certain evidence at trial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Did ‘he \OXy Civew } eer by not at anor ms) ap per! be Cany oF a Cov Bc gh aA Amst once my Aekense attowtey Was Ms) proseen tk.

Docket Entries

2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-23
Waiver of right of respondent Vincent Horton, Warden. et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)

Attorneys

Arnoldo Navarette
Arnoldo Navarette — Petitioner
Arnoldo Navarette — Petitioner
Vincent Horton, Warden. et al.
Jane Alissa BernsteinNew Mexico Attorney General, Respondent
Jane Alissa BernsteinNew Mexico Attorney General, Respondent