Whether the Court of appeals' decision denying Petitioner's request for a COA is contrary to the decision of this Court

No question identified. : — ‘1. Whether the Courk of appeals’ decision denying Peaihionar’s veguesk for a Corhificate | ‘Of appealability (COA) 15 Contyory to the decision of Ahis Court when the Courk of appeals, |__ sidestepped ahe.COA Process by deciding dhe merit OF appeal fist ond thus decided | _Pexixioner’s appeal withouk jurishickion ? a oo | ne 2 (TL Whether ae Courk of appeals’ decision denying Pekikioner's reBuesh Sor 0 COA iS con|_oyoahe decison of ais Court when teasnabe. juris wo Sind he he Ais | Court's assessments of Petitioner's. Constitutional claims in he § 22.55 mokion were wrong Lordebaiae? J | Suggested answer: Affirmative, ee ps \ Cn cece ce geet enna EE | as OO | EEE ——— Z oO ed eT a STATEMENT. OF JURISDICTION. = -seutce sees resets send COMPELLTNG REASONS FOR GRANTING THIS PETITION. =e seo ene ne 8 TL. The Court of appeals’ decision denying Pekikioner’s Teguest for a COA iS Contrary to. th _ARCisION OF hid Courk because it Sideskepeed the COA Process by deciding the merik of staf. anh ss. died Pekikioner’s appeal withouk JUNSAICHON ner a8 : LL. The Courk of appeals’ decision denying Pekikioner's veguesk for 0 COA IS Contrary to 4he; |__-decision of #his Courk because reasonable jurists would Sind the diskrick Cowrk’s . | assessments of Pekikioner’s Conskikutional Claims in the $2255 motion wrong or debaYOUN annette teens eos eee ee eens tenet ae ee cote segment eee tee eee AD LA. The dishrick Court’s decision thot 4he Procedural Aefautk of Pekikioner’s Unconstikutionall |__Seareh and Seizwre lait Could nok be Overcome, was wrong or debotoble when Khere. | —2nisted TAC and Prejudice, because is AeCision 1S Conran 40 the ACCISION OF Kis Court: , |_—_Un ane Cose of Mura V. CONGY. oes cree es tacecnetartte aes rs |} . BT AiSHICE COUTH'S decision thor Petitioner Aid nok receive TAC, was wrong or debatoble |___ when Counsel failed 40 File 0 brie in Support of the motion fo Suppress evidence, ecause is "decision of Probable. cause existence in 4he asfidavit, dooh Soi excopion and prejudice we ___Sulking From Counsel’s Said failure is Contrary to the decision of Ahis Courk im relevant __|. The district courk’s decision #hox Probable Cause existed inthe Offidowit, Was wrong | _ Or delboatoble, because its decision io Contrari\ 40 the decision of his Court in dhe Cos . | __ of Franks v. Delowore,, Tiinois v. cio Ui Sn is. i Theis om dzasn that she magiStrake Could make a reasonable inference that etitioner’'s Prescriptions were issued oukside the usal Course of professional practicd it} . [ork wits eine waedical Purpose... was wrong Or iota pei. Su [sisson eds His Court inthe Case Of Franks. v. Delaware, | | _ond Lilinois v. Gores, the Pain management expert's Opinion, the sister Circuit Court"s; decision, the Aistrick Court's own raling, and OMY Login. essnee eens eel |-———0Thi oo ssn sa hn ae, on bet ose — Ollegadions in-the attidavit, Could make a reasonable inference. obouk Petitioner's prescrip L _ ions in. 2015, loased upon its Lenal vuling in 2021, 15 contol, to the decision o-+ Anis) | Courk inthe case of Franks V. Deaths senses eee seen [Tdi at's Acs hol est, wt onal tp, i— maKe.o reasonable inference about Pekikioner’s Prescriptions it-25.15cankon te C (The Jishick courh’s decision that 4h magistte, loased upon the above-described lean |_yuting on 0. eosonoble inference about prescriphions withouk benefit of reviewing Ae | patients’ medical records, could make 0 reasonable inference about Petitioner's Pres-. | _Criphions, 15 contrary to the Poin monayemenk expert's opinion, rhe Federation of State Medico! Boards’ stokement, the Sister Cirtuik Court's decision and i$ own vuling WA_ON0tKCr COSQ on evens rete ee ete eee Sree pene elt A. The distvick Cowrk’s decision #hok rhe magistroke 0S 0 Loyperson, hosed upon iS leaol. __Yuling Ceeaked in 2021, was able to moKe O reasonable inference in 2015. thot Pedic Hioner’s. prescriptions weve ished oukside the Usual Course of Professional prackiceanh [___witk eg