Solely-with-lies-and-fabricated-numbers-on-paper-without-evidence-how-can-petitioner-be-ordered-to-pay

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Solely with the lies and fabricated numbers on paper, without even one evidence, how can Petitioner be ordered to pay $47,319.86? 2. In a civil case, is the Judge allowed to stop completely and prevent Discovery repeatedly by violating the court procedure and Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 to help Respondent to cheat with solely lies? 3. Is the Judge allowed to repeatedly violate Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, not only 100% completely denied all Petitioner’s Motion to compel without reason, even Respondent never objected the motions, but also never rule on two Petitioner’s Motion to compel forever? 4. Is the Judge allowed to violate the court Procedure, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 40 and Fed. R. Evid. 602, totally and permanently prevent any trial in this case? 5. Is the Judge allowed being the backup and . Defending Lawyer for Respondent, and asking what Respondent wanted, then 100% granted all to Respondent? 6. Is the Judge allowed to be the Advisor for Respondent and in his 5/18/2021 order asked Respondent to fabricate new lies on lien, which never existed and neither in any of Respondent’s four Motions for Summary Judgements. . 7, Why after having concluded all three “witnesses” have no personal knowledge on the fines, but the Judge still granted $14,156.86 to Respondent in the final order, based on those lies from fake “witnesses” who were not there at all, by violating Fed. R. Evid. 602 willfully? ii 8. How can the Judge, in conflicting to his own order, grant Respondent’s 4th Motion for Summary Judgement by violating Fed. R. Evid. 602, when the laws, the Motions and the affidavits were all exactly same, after Respondent’ 8rd Motion was denied by himself? 9. Is the Judge allowed to fabricate the fraud $6.36 in his 8/3/2021 final order, by himself, trying to change . this fault case with solely fabricated fake fines to a lien collection case? ; 10. How can NH Supreme Court Judges, by hiding all the facts, support all trial Court Judge’s violations to the Federal Laws, NH Laws and Constitution? . 11. According to what the $33,163 attorney fee was granted for submitting only five documents with total 39 text pages? Why the NH Supreme Court ; Judges could not give even one word on the fact, evidence or the laws for granting the fabricated $33,163? 12. How can the Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights on the Seventh Amendment have been complete stripped away? In the entire four years court proceed: ings, why any of Trial, Testify, or the Oral-Argument was completely prevented, and never be mentioned : even once anywhere by the Judges? _ LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Supreme Court for the State of New Hampshire . No. 2021-0399 Brandywyne Common Condominium v. Weixing V. Wang Date of Final Judgment: October 18, 2022 Date of Denial of Reconsideration: November 14, 2022 Superior Court of the State of New Hampshire No. 218-2019-CV-00221 Brandywyne Common Condominium v. Weixing V. Wang Date of Final Order: August 3, 2021