Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a facial constitutional challenge to a criminal statute under the Commerce Clause can be brought by post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12, certain arguments—including those alleging “a defect in the indictment”—“must be raised by pretrial motion,” or the argument “is untimely.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(83), (c)(3). In contrast, “[a] motion that the court lacks jurisdiction may be made at any time.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2). The question presented is: Whether, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12, Petitioners were permitted to bring a facial constitutional challenge to their statute of conviction under the Commerce Clause by filing a post-trial motion rather than a pretrial motion.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-25
Reply of petitioners Carlos Herrera, et al. filed.
2023-05-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 15, 2023.
2023-04-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 1, 2023 to May 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 1, 2023.
2023-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2023 to May 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 31, 2023)
2023-01-20
Application (22A645) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until February 24, 2023.
2023-01-13
Application (22A645) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2023 to February 24, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.