Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Why should Petitioner not have to serve his documents which are filed in the United States . Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, with regard to "Griffith v New York State [ ], 21-2133", to Jan Nastri? The letter received by the United States Supreme Court and the People on January 25, 2022, demonstrates substantive Rosario Material. (see Exhibit D) ‘ Why is "Griffith vy New York State [ ], 21-2133" essential to a Motion for Extension of Time to Take an Appeal? | | The improper conduct of public servants is an essential remedy to be considered with a request for an extension of time to take an appeal (see NY [C]riminal [P]rocedure [L]law § 460.30[1]) which is an essential remedy considered with "Griffith v New York State [ ], 21-2133". Should leave to appeal have been granted by the New York State Court of Appeals? The New York State Court of Appeals did not consider that an order by the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division/Fourth Department, to deny a Motion for Extension of Time to Take an Appeal is appealable to the New York State Court of Appeals if such order states that the determination was made upon the law alone, and a judge of the court of appeals, pursuant to procedure provided in NY [C]riminal [P]rocedure [L]aw § 460.20, issues a certificate ‘ granting leave to the appellant to appeal to the court of appeals. (CPL § 460.30[6]) i