Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether lab results requested not by law enforcement but by a forensic pathologist to assist in making a routine cause of death determination are testimonial in nature and their admission without cross-examination of the analyst violates a criminal defendant's right to confrontation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether lab results requested not by law enforcement but by a forensic pathologist to assist in making a routine cause of death determination are testimonial in nature and their admission without cross-examination of the analyst violates a criminal defendant’s right to confrontation as articulated in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 51 (2004), Melendez—Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009), and Ohio v. Clark, 576 U.S. 237 (2015). ii STATEMENT OF
2023-06-20
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-15
Brief of respondent Angela D. Brewer in opposition filed.
2023-05-15
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docketed June 5, 2023) filed by respondent Angela D. Brewer.
2023-03-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 15, 2023.
2023-03-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 14, 2023 to May 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 14, 2023)
2022-12-30
Application (22A589) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 11, 2023.
2022-12-16
Application (22A589) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 10, 2023 to March 11, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.