No. 22-7321
Schuyler Scarborough v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus retroactivity right-to-counsel state-criminal-procedure
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether the State of Oklahoma afforded petitioner a constitutionally adequate opportunity to receive the assistance of Counsel for his case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Lc c lL. whether the State of OKlaho atforded perdiaret a eonstpodiorally adequate epportuirty +b fe ve ee denied the aseistance of Counsel tor his OaRASe Ss 4. whether the Hate of 0Klahera incorrectly plassrtied ; y, v3 o thie touts decision tn mebict as a nevt procedural rule® nr a © Se be f sf, fee renee Bee BE a igegintk ae GE ae ee oe < : 4 ys a og ran A a 7 : . ye
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-04-06
Application (22A869) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until June 8, 2023.
2023-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 19, 2023)
2023-03-20
Application (22A869) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 9, 2023 to June 8, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Schuyler Scarborough
Schuyler Scarborough — #125148-F-104, Petitioner
Schuyler Scarborough — #125148-F-104, Petitioner