No. 22-874
Andrew Meisner, Oakland County Treasurer, et al. v. Tawanda Hall, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-law due-process equitable-title foreclosure municipal-law property-rights surplus-proceeds takings takings-clause tax-delinquency tax-foreclosure
Key Terms:
Takings DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Takings DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Related Cases:
22-996
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether foreclosing on a home for the nonpayment of taxes constitutes a violation of the federal Takings Clause whenever the home is worth more than the tax delinquency
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is substantively the same one this Court is already considering in Tyler v. Hennepin County, No. 22-166: 1. Whether foreclosing on a home for the nonpayment of taxes constitutes a violation of the federal Takings Clause whenever the home is worth more than the tax delinquency.
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Tawanda Hall, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2023)
Attorneys
Andrew Meisner, et al.
John J. Bursch — Bursch Law PLLC, Petitioner
John J. Bursch — Bursch Law PLLC, Petitioner
Tawanda Hall, et al.
Christina Marie Martin — Pacific Legal Foundation, Respondent
Christina Marie Martin — Pacific Legal Foundation, Respondent