No. 22-7441
Colette Claire Savage v. Mark Savage
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-corruption judicial-discrimination motion-to-dismiss pro-se pro-se-litigation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are motions to dismiss used administratively to hastily dispose of meritorious and government corruption cases especially targeting pro se litigants?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED © . 1. Are motions to dismiss used administratively to hastily dispose of meritorious and government corruption cases especially targeting pro se litigants? 2. Are pro se litigants a commonly discriminated class of people. throughout the United States court system? ii
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-23
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Savage to respond filed.
2022-04-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 1, 2023)
2022-03-11
Application (21A497) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 9, 2022.
2022-03-02
Application (21A497) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 10, 2022 to May 9, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Mark Savage
Robert Loewy Nelson — Attorney at Law, Respondent
Robert Loewy Nelson — Attorney at Law, Respondent