No. 22-7599
Curtis Marcel Barnette v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process government-prosecution plea-agreement plea-bargaining right-to-appeal waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does it violate due process for a defendant to be required to waive his right to appeal in order to enter into an otherwise favorable plea agreement with the government?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED DOES IT VIOLATE DUE PROCESS FOR A DEFENDANT TO BE REQUIRED TO WAIVE HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL IN ORDER TO ENTER INTO AN OTHERWISE FAVORABLE PLEA AGREEMENT WITH THE GOVERNMENT? i
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Curtis Barnette
James Braxton Craven III — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent