No. 22-7306

Keith Thomas v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-04-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 1st-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech judicial-procedure rule-11 sanctions seventh-amendment standing
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the district court improperly apply Rule 11 sanctions against this petitioner basically stripping him of his 1st-amendment-rights and 7th-amendment-rights in an unconstitutional manner and did the 11th-circuit-court-of-appeals improperly uphold the Rule 11 sanctions applied by the district court?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the district court improperly apply Rule 11 sanctions against this petitioner basically stripping him of his 1‘ amendment rights and 7" amendment rights in an unconstitutional manner and did the 11 Circuit Court of Appeals improperly uphold the Rule 11 sanctions applied by the district court? 2. Did the district court improperly convey banking and financial authority upon Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a/k/a MERS and Merscorp Holdings, Inc. by refusing to accept the findings by the federal courts in the case of MERS, Inc. v. Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance, 704 N.W. 2d 784 (2005) and did the 11" Circuit Court of Appeals Order confirm and support the bestowing of banking and financial authority upon this same non-banking and financing entity? 3. Did the actions and authority of an unauthorized private attorney working as a contractor or contracted employee with a Georgia foreclosure law firm constitute a lawful transfer of a financial interest within this petitioner’s Georgia residential property when that alleged financial transfer of interest violated Georgia law? 4. Did the district court and other justices in the 11 Circuit Court of i Appeals operate and issue orders improperly in light of the obvious conflicts of interests they are held with one or more of the defendants named to this petitioners’ complaints before the federal courts?

Docket Entries

2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-31
Waiver of right of respondents Rubin Lublin, LLC; Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-04-26
Waiver of right of respondents Bank of America, N.A., McGuireWoods LLP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2023)

Attorneys

Bank of America, N.A., McGuireWoods LLP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.
Addison SmithMcGuireWoods LLP, Respondent
Addison SmithMcGuireWoods LLP, Respondent
Keith Thomas
Keith E. Thomas — Petitioner
Keith E. Thomas — Petitioner
Rubin Lublin, LLC; Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Bret ChanessRubin Lublin, LLC, Respondent
Bret ChanessRubin Lublin, LLC, Respondent