No. 22-1127

Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes, Manuel Real Beneficiary, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment bribery due-process equal-protection honest-services-fraud judicial-immunity pro-se pro-se-litigation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Antitrust DueProcess FourthAmendment Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-11-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How can the DOJ bring multiple indictments for judges in several circuits, inclusive of counts for honest services fraud and bribery, but then represent the federal judges in Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes et al., claiming that bribery of a judge does not pierce the veil of judicial immunity?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. How can the DOJ bring multiple indictments for judges in several circuits, inclusive of counts for honest services fraud and bribery, but then represent the federal judges in Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes et al., claiming that bribery of a judge does not pierce the veil of judicial immunity? 2. What constitutional safeguards exist to secure a pro se litigant’s 14th Amendment due process rights and equal protection under the laws in the United States? 3. Does a pro se enjoy the same constitutional safeguards as those retained by represented parties? : ‘

Docket Entries

2023-11-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-21
Waiver of right of respondents Kevin Lussier and Kim D. Ashley to respond filed.
2023-06-08
Request for recusal received from petitioner.
2023-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent Hon. Percy Anderson, Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez, Hon. Paul Watford, Tao Sykes, Michael Duggan, Renico Smith, Megan J. Brennan and Louis DeJoy to respond filed.
2023-05-23
Waiver of right of respondents Michael Ventura, Arturo Sandoval, Michael Soliman, Richard Parks, Charles Schlund, Gabrielle Taylor to respond filed.
2023-05-22
Waiver of right of respondents Barbara Soloman, Craig Mende and Sean Harb to respond filed.
2023-05-11

Attorneys

Barbara Soloman, Craig Mende and Sean Harb
David Mitchel MajchrzakKlinedinst PC, Respondent
David Mitchel MajchrzakKlinedinst PC, Respondent
Christine Sawicky
Christine Sawicky — Petitioner
Christine Sawicky — Petitioner
Hon. Percy Anderson, Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez, Hon. Paul Watford, Tao Sykes, Michael Duggan, Renico Smith , Megan J. Brennan and Louis DeJoy
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Kevin Lussier and Kim D. Ashley
Coleman D. HeggiLester, Cantrell & Kraus, LLP, Respondent
Coleman D. HeggiLester, Cantrell & Kraus, LLP, Respondent
Michael Ventura, Arturo Sandoval, Michael Soliman, Richard Parks, Charles Schlund, Gabrielle Taylor
Michael Martin WalshCity of Los Angeles, City Attorney, Respondent
Michael Martin WalshCity of Los Angeles, City Attorney, Respondent