No. 22-1129

Faraz Fadavi Akhavan Bonab v. Samuel Ginn

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-05-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: business-relationship due-process forum-state fourteenth-amendment personal-jurisdiction purposeful-contacts specific-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state court to exercise specific jurisdiction over a defendant when the plaintiff's claims arise from the defendant's purposeful contacts with the forum state, including a business relationship formed in the forum state where the parties reside, even though the injury occurred in another state

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a state court may exercise specific jurisdiction when the plaintiff's claims arise out of or relate to the defendant’s purposeful contacts with the forum state. The Question Presented is: Whether this requirement is met when the defendant forms a business relationship with the plaintiff in the forum state, where both reside, the parties travel pursuant to that relationship to another state, where the defendant causes injury to the plaintiff, and both subsequently return to the forum state.

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-15
Waiver of right of respondent Samuel Ginn to respond filed.
2023-05-16

Attorneys

Faraz Fadavi Akhavan Bonab
John C. SteinThe Boccardo Law Firm, Inc., Petitioner
John C. SteinThe Boccardo Law Firm, Inc., Petitioner
Samuel Ginn
Steven S. FleischmanHorvitz & Levy LLP, Respondent
Steven S. FleischmanHorvitz & Levy LLP, Respondent