No. 22-1240

Nicolas Tashman v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights employment employment-discrimination respondeat-superior statutory-interpretation supreme-court tortious-acts
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether general common law principles of respondeat superior apply to hold an employer liable for an employee's tortious acts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 42 U.S.C. § 1981 guarantees that “[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts ... as is enjoyed by white citizens.” A direct conflict exists among federal courts of appeals as to when, and under what circumstances, an employer can be held responsible under § 1981 for the acts of an employee. This case squarely presents the following question: Whether general common law principles of respondeat superior apply to hold an employer liable for an employee’s tortious acts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

Docket Entries

2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-12
2023-08-28
2023-06-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 28, 2023.
2023-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 27, 2023 to August 28, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-22

Attorneys

Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Lori Ann SchmidtLitchfield Cavo LLP, Respondent
Lori Ann SchmidtLitchfield Cavo LLP, Respondent
Andrew Samuel Connell Jr.Litchfield Cavo, LLP, Respondent
Andrew Samuel Connell Jr.Litchfield Cavo, LLP, Respondent
Nicolas Tashman
Mark Steven SchuverMathis, Marifian & Richter, Ltd., Petitioner
Mark Steven SchuverMathis, Marifian & Richter, Ltd., Petitioner