No. 22-140

Yvette B. Beaulieu v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-08-15
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure disclosure-requirements due-process equal-protection federal-employee government-investigation government-misconduct legal-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why is there no equal application of relevant fairness principles in civil and criminal matters?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHY IS THERE NO EQUAL APPLICATION OF RELEVANT FAIRNESS PRINCIPLES IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL MATTERS? 2. WHY IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ALLOWED TO SCHEME BETWEEN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL MATTERS AS A LEGAL TACTIC WITHOUT DISCLOSING THIS TO THE COURTS OR TO EITHER PARTY, AND WHICH ALLOWS THE USG TO SUBVERT THE PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH, THE CONCEPTS OF FAIRNESS, AND THE EQUAL APPLICATION OF JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW? | 3. WHY DOES THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NOT HAVE TO DISCLOSE TO THE COURTS WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL WAS UNDER CRIMINAL OR CIVIL INVESTIGATION AT THE OUTSET USING FISA OR ANY OTHER COURT ORDERED SURVEILLANCE WARRANT, ESPECIALLY IN CASES INVOLVING CUR, RENT AND/OR FORMER USG FEDERAL EM} PLOYEES? | | |

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General to respond filed.
2022-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Yvette B. Beaulieu
Yvette B. Beaulieu — Petitioner
Yvette B. Beaulieu — Petitioner