| 24A1096 |
Sonal N. Desai v. David Steiner, Postmaster General |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-05-15 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-rights employment-discrimination federal-employee motion-to-dismiss rehabilitation-act title-vii |
Whether Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act preclude dismissal of an employment discrimination claim by a federal employee based on the district cour… |
| 24-955 |
Gabino Ramos Hernandez v. Phillip Causey |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-03-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 bivens-action constitutional-rights federal-employee state-action willful-participation |
Whether the rule in Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. regarding state action through willful participation is still controlling law, and how federal employee… |
| 24-5363 |
Anthony Wong v. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-08-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-of-appeals false-testimony federal-employee judicial-review perjury sanctions |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals erred in denying Motions for Sanctions and Referral for Perjury by a federal employee, despite alleged false testimo… |
| 23-1019 |
Dennis McLain v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-03-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
causation-standard civil-rights discrimination due-process employment employment-discrimination federal-employee federal-employment jury-instruction retaliation title-vii whistleblowing |
Whether the jury should be instructed on the causation standard delineated in Babb v. Wilkie for federal employee Title VII claims |
| 23-866 |
Evan H. Nordby v. Social Security Administration |
Federal Circuit |
2024-02-12 |
GVR |
Relisted (3) |
active-duty civil-rights differential-pay due-process federal-employee federal-employment military-reserve military-reserves national-emergency pay-differential statutory-interpretation |
Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential … |
| 23-837 |
Casey Campbell v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-02-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
de-novo-review federal-employee first-amendment judicial-admissions qualified-immunity religious-discrimination title-vii workplace |
Are employer statements on religious discrimination binding judicial admissions in a Title VII de novo review? |
| 23-6009 |
Mario Austin v. American Building Company |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-11-16 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-claims civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination equal-protection federal-employee national-origin retaliation title-vii |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in dismissing Mr. Rustin's claims of retaliation and national origin discrimination under Title VII |
| 23-345 |
In Re Jeffry Thul |
|
2023-10-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-employee federal-employee-rights mandamus regulatory-compliance statutory-interpretation takings |
Whether the National Park Service municipality's conduct violated 5 C.F.R. § 353.301(d) or constitutional rights |
| 23-60 |
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. v. Feds for Medical Freedom, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-07-21 |
GVR |
Relisted (9) |
administrative-law civil-service-reform-act covid-19 covid-vaccination executive-order federal-employee federal-employment mootness preliminary-injunction |
Whether the court of appeals' judgment should be vacated and remanded as moot |
| 23-21 |
Stuart R. Harrow v. Department of Defense |
Federal Circuit |
2023-07-06 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (5)Relisted (4) |
administrative-law federal-circuit federal-employee filing-deadline judicial-review jurisdictional jurisdictional-deadline merit-systems-protection-board nonjurisdictional statutory-interpretation |
Whether the 60-day deadline in 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) is jurisdictional |
| 22-140 |
Yvette B. Beaulieu v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2022-08-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure disclosure-requirements due-process equal-protection federal-employee government-investigation government-misconduct legal-fairness |
Why is there no equal application of relevant fairness principles in civil and criminal matters? |
| 20-985 |
Kathryn A. Flynn v. Department of the Army |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-01-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-remedies circuit-split exhaustion-doctrine federal-employee federal-employee-rights ninth-circuit protected-activities res-judicata retaliation whistleblower-protection whistleblower-protection-act |
Where a federal employee failed to exhaust administrative remedies for all protected activities |
| 20-5131 |
Michael Kimbrew v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bribery-of-public-official bribery-statute commercial-bribery due-process federal-employee ninth-circuit-interpretation official-act public-official quid-pro-quo statutory-interpretation sun-diamond |
Is Kimbrew's expansive reading of § 201 unconstitutional? |
| 18-8315 |
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
5-usc-2302 age-discrimination civil-rights disability-discrimination due-process employment employment-discrimination federal-employee in-vitro-fertilization medical-leave probationary-employment sex-discrimination termination-rights |
Shall the Court immediately reinstate back to work a Federal employee who was fired for an attempt to get pregnant, for being discriminated against se… |
| 18-7015 |
Joe Ann West v. Richard V. Spencer, Secretary of the Navy |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-employment-opportunity federal-employee federal-employee-discrimination free-speech judicial-misconduct standing |
Was petitioner a Federal Employee denied United States Citizen's Constitutional 1st Amendment Rights when denied by the judge the right to be speak, s… |