No. 22-202

Leonardo Nuncio v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2022-09-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure due-process first-amendment free-speech harassment-statute obscenity obscenity-test overbreadth texas-penal-code vagueness
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference: 2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is Texas's obscene harassment statute unconstitutionally vague and overbroad?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is Texas’s obscene harassment statute (Tex. Penal Code 42.07(a)(1) and (b)(3)) unconstitutionally vague and overbroad? 2. Does the Miller v. California obscenity test chill critical speech and emotional speech? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas No. PD-0478-19 Ex Parte Leonardo Nuncio Date of Final Opinion: April 6, 2022 Date of Rehearing Denial: June 8, 2022 Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas No. 04-18-00127-CR Ex Parte Leonardo Nuncio Date of Final Judgment: April 10, 2019 County Court, Webb County, Texas Cause Number: 2017 CVJ 002365 C1 Ex Parte Leonardo Nuncio Date of Final Judgment: February 12, 2018

Docket Entries

2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Leonardo Nuncio
Oscar Osmar PenaOsmar O. Pena Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Oscar Osmar PenaOsmar O. Pena Law, PLLC, Petitioner