No. 22-221
Jose Mendoza, Jr. v. Amalgamated Transit Union International, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: collective-bargaining collective-bargaining-agreements federal-forum labor-management-relations-act labor-management-reporting-and-disclosure-act preemption state-law-claims state-law-preemption union-constitution union-constitutions union-governance
Latest Conference:
2022-11-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does § 301 of the LMRA completely preempt state law claims and remedies by union members against their unions to enforce union constitutions despite the LMRDA's six savings clauses preserving state law claims and remedies to enforce union constitutions?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does § 301 of the LMRA completely preempt state law claims and remedies by union members against their unions to enforce union constitutions despite the LMRDA's six savings clauses preserving state law claims and remedies to enforce union constitutions?
Docket Entries
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-09-16
Waiver of right of respondents Amalgamated Transit Union International, et al. to respond filed.
2022-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2022)
2022-06-28
Application (21A862) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 4, 2022.
2022-06-27
Application (21A862) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 6, 2022 to September 4, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Amalgamated Transit Union International, et al.
Ramya Ravindran — Bredhoff & Kaiser, P.L.L.C., Respondent
Jose Mendoza, et al.