Adam Bruzzese v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Can the adverse employment action against Adam Bruzzese stand if it was administered in a manner which does not satisfy due process requirements?
Can a due process claim be raised if due process violations were included as elements of an EEO claim which was dismissed without considering these violations?
Does the District and Second Circuit Courts' lack of consideration of the ATF/DOJ failure to adhere to any of the aspects of due process in administering the adverse employment action necessitate a per curiam decision in favor of Bruzzese?
Can the adverse employment action against Adam Bruzzese stand if it was administered in a manner which does not satisfy due process requirements?