Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the National Bank Act preempts state laws that, like California Civil Code § 2954.8(a), attempt to set the terms on which federally chartered banks may offer mortgage escrow accounts authorized by federal law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The National Bank Act grants federally chartered banks both express and incidental powers. Those powers include the express authority to engage in real estate lending and the incidental power to administer associated escrow accounts used to pay real estate taxes, insurance, and similar fees. The Ninth Circuit has held that state laws that require banks to pay interest on funds held in mortgage escrow accounts, like California Civil Code § 2954.8(a), do not significantly interfere with those federally endowed powers and are not preempted. The Second Circuit has reached the opposite conclusion. The question presented is as follows: Whether the National Bank Act preempts state laws that, like California Civil Code § 2954.8(a), attempt to set the terms on which federally chartered banks may offer mortgage escrow accounts authorized by federal law.
2024-06-10
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Cantero</i> v. <i>Bank of America, N.A.</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2023-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-09-13
Supplemental brief of petitioner Flagstar Bank, N.A. filed. (Distributed)
2023-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-03-27
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2023-03-13
Supplemental brief of petitioner Flagstar Bank, N.A. filed. (Distributed)
2023-03-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-20
Reply of petitioner Flagstar Bank, N.A. filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-16
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2022-12-13
Brief of respondents William Kivett, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-12-08
Letter from counsel for petitioner regarding amendment to corporate disclosure statement filed.
2022-12-02
Motion to further extend the time to file a response denied.
2022-12-02
Response to motion to further extend the time to file a response from petitioner filed.
2022-12-01
Motion to further extend the time to file a response from December 13, 2022 to December 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-23
Brief amici curiae of Bank Policy Institute, et al. filed.
2022-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 13, 2022.
2022-11-10
Response to motion to extend the time to file a response from petitioner filed.
2022-11-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 28, 2022 to December 13, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-27
Response Requested. (Due November 28, 2022)
2022-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent William Kivett, et al. to respond filed.
2022-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)