No. 22-461
Scott Troogstad, et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights covid-19 covid-19-mandate due-process employment employment-condition first-amendment religious-exemption substantive-due-process vaccination-mandate vaccine-policy
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment LaborRelations Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment LaborRelations Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the City of Chicago violated substantive due process in requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of their employment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L. Whether the City of Chicago violated substantive due process in requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of their employment. I. Whether the City of Chicago violated the First Amendment in conditioning religious exemptions to its vaccination policy on its appraisal of the correctness of the religious bases for requests for religious exceptions.
Docket Entries
2023-01-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois Governor Jay Robert Pritzker to respond filed.
2022-11-08
Attorneys
Illinois Governor Jay Robert Pritzker
Frank Henry Bieszczat — Office of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent
Frank Henry Bieszczat — Office of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent