No. 22-5063

Michael A. Tulipat v. United States

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 7th-amendment administrative-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-employment military-discharge military-justice rule-42b standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Rule 42(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims, 'Failure to Prosecute' overrule the 7th Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Does Rule 42(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims, “Failure to | Prosecute” overrule the 7 Amendment? Was dismissing my case the only remedy? . 2) Is our judicial system in place solely for government interest? 3) Can the government create a stigma for a young colored man diminishing equal employment opportunity for 20 years without repercussions? 4) Does 10 US Code §815-Article 15 goes against our Founding Fathers purpose of the Constitution that did not allow one person to have too much authority or control? | 5) After the hearing on September 15, 2010, 111th U.S House of Representatives, Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. Is it equitable just to , relabel the narratives of the 22,600 servicemembers that were improperly discharged with personality disorder for the conveniences of Secretarial of Authority? 6) Is the Military Administrative Boards, lower trial courts, and the Department of Justice’s function is to legally protect government and white citizens interest only? j | II.

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-12-23
Application (22A344) granted by The Chief Justice further extending the time to file until January 2, 2023.
2022-12-23
Petitioner complied with order of October 3, 2022.
2022-12-21
Application (22A344) for a further extension of time within which to comply with the order of October 3, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2022-10-26
Application (22A344) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 23, 2022.
2022-10-17
Application (22A344) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of October 3, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2022-10-03
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2022)
2022-04-05
Application (21A576) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 12, 2022.
2022-03-22
Application (21A576) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 13, 2022 to June 12, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Michael Tulipat
Michael A. Tulipat — Petitioner
Michael A. Tulipat — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent