Fourth-Amendment,Fourth-Amendment-search,Probable-cause,Witness-testimony,In-camera-hearing,Shackling,Eyewitness-identification,Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Profositien One: The Search warrant iSSued on June 20;2elb autherizing t search dota stored on APPellants Phone vues general mnadure and helefore unlawhul in Vielatien of he Fourih Amendm Shit and Article 8 30 of the oklehoma Canstitution. Proposttion Two ihe affidavits in SuPPortk of both dune 20, 2elb Search wartauts were insuflicients Te eStablsh Probable Case in VioledionS of Article TL 830 of the oklahoma Constitution and the feurth Amendment To The unibed States Constitution, . | Profos ition hree. he distruet court Ce Poatedly and imPre Perly alloted Stade ulttnesses Ta fefresh their tecollection waith cdotuments that olhecs Prerared. PraPositian Cour’ the District Courts fei lure To tanduct an in Lames. Nearing | fegatding he identity La “Confidential uiiness constituted reversible LF (a0, ProPeSitien Five! APPeldan4d vwsas imPraPerly Shackled and fot Permitted to sit with his oterney during his Non dury Trial. Pro Position Sav.Lead Datectve missed identilication of defendant when curtness’s — described Someone witha differant leak and Style as defendant. Lead MetectiJe Vieclacted em amend ment right for a fear Trrel of net fly deg his deb nest igating and has admitted Te Ws failure on Cecord once had neThng wlSe voae indestigaded & S$ Ofes Set endeFendent Peo Position Seven! inefhectibe of Counsel by failing To bring imfortant La eds | up clucing Trial and mis|\tading delendent mto Signing his right s cha water oder To Kot hade ov Jury Trial of hiS Peers, |