| 22-5749 |
Justin Jamal Warner v. South Carolina |
South Carolina |
2022-10-04 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
criminal-defendant-rights criminal-procedure due-process eyewitness-identification in-camera-hearing law-enforcement-procedure out-of-court-identification police-misconduct reliability-standard surveillance-video unreliable-evidence video-identification |
Whether a criminal defendant is entitled to an in camera hearing on the reliability of an out-of-court identification made through video technology un… |
| 22-5080 |
Jacky Cardale Mayfield v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2022-07-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
confidential-witness due-process Fourth-Amendment Fourth-Amendment-search In-camera-hearing ineffective-counsel Probable-cause search-warrant Shackling Witness-testimony |
Fourth-Amendment,Fourth-Amendment-search,Probable-cause,Witness-testimony,In-camera-hearing,Shackling,Eyewitness-identification,Ineffective-assistance… |
| 20-5793 |
Francisco Zendejas v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confidential-informant criminal-defendant disclosure disclosure-motion due-process-rights in-camera-hearing roviaro-standard roviaro-v-united-states threshold-showing |
When a criminal defendant moves to disclose the identity of a confidential informant under Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 58 (1957), and makes a t… |
| 19-843 |
Daniel K. Holtzclaw v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2020-01-06 |
Denied |
|
defense-counsel-exclusion dna-evidence due-process ex-parte-hearing exculpatory-evidence expert-witness fair-trial forensic-expert in-camera-hearing materiality-standard prosecutorial-misconduct |
What is the standard of materiality applicable in assessing the prejudicial impact of potential exculpatory evidence relating to the State's chief for… |