Glendrick Gardner v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, et al.
Whether the Gardner's workers' compensation claim was properly denied by LEUCG (Waste Management)
Questions Presented toa le marcy Dec &1. AOIS and May ad, Alo , y IG. : a | LEUCG ardeved LFUCR CWaste Manesemet) to aclmi+ Me Gardnrew vote Rapkis* Welty Under LFOC G moms loot ne addvess of Ev He. nite | woth ReMue Pea gfe Manager _ Russell Scott Me ber dner's MON = Gppecting ——__ . LOE esg et Wo Un a pole Orssat Neeaeag oe Cos pensation Claim tn” , — 5 @l why cs Me Garda eter te ga throug L a , sheir emolgees on the Jab? rs : Fedevs | Government doesnt Sde ANY Loleng iw Government fs. 3 | [ (hot happens \necause. Me Gardner neve" — “ones sekod * ee ss : a ? ge —_ Courts awere +1 + +e sett he , | Mis cleat ik Starts back +o Dee al 21s? | The clan Stacks from Ye TID repacts tte Ludete tannnganent 12, 281-L8-Plns _ laste Soames Howes, LFUcc., Bisk Managements 7 ia en silted xt 2 re sp Brom poping We, Gardner Risk , lknes dias hat We. Qrarcnar Gas ros ied to | = BS Xmas appegled Me Cordaars | Wee 3 Lears Farmer At Seamses Nawves “Sor Mp | [scnteg Workers Como, Myx (sardine v= ; how Idd heave tecered TTY Wenelite, Trstead : lof ulns G years wither income, L 2, 144 | . Bar Caueis bal ow used every ere AD se¢ LEUC CG out Of Yeaol le excuse. A\vhoug by Alo world Ss galing Haugh asprtalized Mou 2090 wher Me Conder ene bs Cacdere| Court Ma Gonkeer Suns AGASSI ee a a ee EEE (EEE _ | 2. NE