No. 22-520
Temple University Hospital, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law circuit-court-review federal-labor-policy judicial-estoppel labor-law labor-relations nlrb-jurisdiction precedent subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration ERISA Securities LaborRelations Privacy
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration ERISA Securities LaborRelations Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the D.C. Circuit lawfully affirmed the National Labor Relations Board's new rule
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the D.C. Circuit lawfully affirmed the National Labor Relations Board’s new rule—categorically barring the application of judicial estoppel to prevent the Board from exercising jurisdiction over a labor union even where, as here, the union’s misconduct is evident and the agency’s credibility is at stake—despite the fact that the rule lacks any basis in precedent, logic or sound labor policy. @)
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent National Labor Relations Board to respond filed.
2022-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 4, 2023)
Attorneys
National Labor Relations Board
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent