No. 22-5222

Travis Lee Combs v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2022-07-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process individual-rights judicial-review legal-standard patent standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Unsure

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (') Unsure (6 Io Gis Sis trit ¢ 0 Robeaus Corns Correctly, But er my Famili Mam. TH as Worth The Try, FZ, by Bec} dent Uncoer) a tuge Wor Wide Cler Garé, Ske A> The MX Can ~ Aryan Sisterhood, Croble Lexa.) Can Ganbicm, The Yimberland Keniona| | theory of TOmileske, Crttalic and Choholis WA Was Grpcomised Last Tine Checked We proxy and Coisuretion Ob The T2L Gest Wifi, Tt Hes Orb 277, Cosble , Chrome Vox Cepeoted “Wis phase ~ Gooble ~ chrome — . Muttens ~ Network Window ~Sweetness Ther an xPinchy / Comcast Emusecy bredban) JHE Sryed Up nae "yy Cap iop. Aon with Q Por Vp On The_ Bextor LAA Hand Crea Dat Said Jou scr Mogrese(ERRoes ) Hove ideo and photos Soued vO Travis Combs 14, 68 SH Gt, @ await Com , Go) Cubs travis Cl © sroit. Gor. AI Emails Were Mackeb, my last—eimar | bas Tavis Combs SISO 1 © Ovtlook. Con. My Doman Was @ Blessed Fan. Gam | IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI . Petitioner respectfully prays that a-writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW [ ] For cases from federal courts: , The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent Washington to respond filed.
2022-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 29, 2022)

Attorneys

Travis Combs
Travis Lee Combs — Petitioner
Travis Lee Combs — Petitioner
Washington
Sara I. BeighLewis County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Sara I. BeighLewis County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent