Joseph Montrel Bourgeois v. Texas
DueProcess
Question not identified
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | DOES BLOCKBURGER VS, UNZTED STATES ABY U,$,294 Egg azaca APPLY TO Thy Case? Doubue JEOAADY DOES BIRCHEZELD (5) CONCURRENT RULINGS APRLY — To my CASE? ATRCHEIELD VS WORTH OAKOTA, 236 45.A44 rpc TED VS NORTH, DPKOTA, S79 US, 128, 176, 4771204 Does Coleman vs. Hampson, 502. Us, 72a, 729,730 (29% Appry To MyCAsE? PROCEDURAL DEFAULT EXCEPTLOW . Does HARRES rs, OKLAHOMA, 433 4S 66.0297 APPLY To my Case? More S&RTOUS FIRST; LESSER INCLUDE! BARRED: : | . DES IASSARO VS, UMETED STRIES $38 US, 500 C200: Apply To my Case? EXCEPT:LOW FoR EFFECTIVE — | Asszs7puce OF CoumSéZ,' | DOES MARTINEZ vs, Ryan, S66 45,2 (2022) APAY 70 my CASE® : CAN A STATE COURT REFUSE TO Follow A UNITED. | STATES SuPREME CouRT PRECEDENT? . Does SLACK VS. NCDANZEL APPLY TO my Case? a . SuCCESsque PETLTLON" SUBSEQUENT FEYLECATZOV 7 OLD DEFEUSE CounSEL ULOLATE STRECKLAND'IS GUARANTEE? (i) : vo |