| 23-695 |
Samantha Taczak, et al. v. Nicolette Cremeans, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-12-27 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights clearly-established-law constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment qualified-immunity section-1983 state-court state-court-precedent u.s-constitution |
What sources of law constitute 'controlling authority' for the purposes of clearly establishing a right when analyzing Section 1983 qualified immunity… |
| 22-5719 |
Shannon Dewayne Reece v. Texas |
Texas |
2022-09-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
aggravated-robbery criminal-conviction double-jeopardy due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct state-court-precedent witness-testimony |
Can a person be convicted of an offense even after the victim testifies that the defendant is not the person that assaulted or robbed them? |
| 22-5356 |
Joseph Montrel Bourgeois v. Texas |
Texas |
2022-08-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-review double-jeopardy effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance procedural-default state-court-precedent state-court-review successive-petition supreme-court-precedent |
Question not identified |
| 21-6385 |
Edward J. Dostal v. Basin Electric Power Cooperative, et al. |
South Dakota |
2021-11-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeal-timeline court-procedure due-process federal-court-precedent filing-deadline motion-dismissal public-utility-regulation sherman-act state-court-precedent supremacy-clause |
Whether the South Dakota Supreme Court's dismissal order violated the Petitioners' due process and supremacy clause rights |
| 19-6955 |
Shondell J. Paul v. New York |
New York |
2019-12-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment appellate-procedure appellate-review constitutional-question due-process federal-constitutional-law fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel precedent stare-decisis state-court state-court-precedent state-court-procedure |
Does the Fourteenth Amendment place an obligation on the New York Court of Appeals to address a federal constitutional question when its prior precede… |