No. 22-542
Tavaris Betts v. United States
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act burglary circuit-split criminal-sentencing generic-burglary intent-requirement specific-intent statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a State's no-intent burglary statute qualifies as generic burglary under the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a State’s no-intent burglary statute qualifies as generic burglary under the Armed Career Criminal Act. (1)
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-27
Reply of petitioner Tavaris Betts filed. (Distributed)
2023-03-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 15, 2023.
2023-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 13, 2023 to March 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-12
Response Requested. (Due February 13, 2023)
2023-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Tavaris Betts
Amy Mason Saharia — Williams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent