No. 22-5552

Robert Budwilowitz v. Marc Nichols Associates, et al.

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2022-09-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eighth-amendment extraordinary-circumstances judicial-efficiency motion-for-leave new-york-procedure ross-factors standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-11-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the dismissal of the motion for leave to appeal by the New York State Court of Appeals inconsistent?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED e Is the dismissal of the motion for leave to appeal by the New York State Court of Appeals (see 2022 NYSlip Op 60107) inconsistent? , e IsN.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 2 § 500.24 correctly applied to the motion of reargument by the New York State Court of Appeals? . : e Is the appeal fully compliant with New York State law? ¢ Have the principles of extraordinary circumstances and the so-called Ross factors; the principles fairness, truth, and judicial efficiency, have been violated? « Has this case a legal precedence? . ¢ Has the Eighth amendment, a Constitutional right, been violated?

Docket Entries

2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2022)
2022-07-21
Application (22A42) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 26, 2022.
2022-06-30
Application (22A42) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 27, 2022 to September 25, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Robert Budwilowitz
Robert Budwilowitz — Petitioner