| 25A595 |
Katy Elizabeth Kabha v. Texas |
Texas |
2025-11-20 |
Application |
|
certiorari extension-of-time felony-conviction judicial-efficiency newly-discovered-evidence pro-se |
Whether a pro se petitioner's request for a 60-day extension to file a certiorari petition should be granted based on pending state-court motions and … |
| 24A154 |
Jeffrey Prosser, et al. v. Gretchen Shappert, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-08-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
administrative-duties bankruptcy judicial-efficiency official-accountability procedural-compliance statutory-interpretation |
Whether administrative officials can be compelled to timely perform statutory duties essential to the integrity of the bankruptcy system |
| 22-5552 |
Robert Budwilowitz v. Marc Nichols Associates, et al. |
New York |
2022-09-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eighth-amendment extraordinary-circumstances judicial-efficiency motion-for-leave new-york-procedure ross-factors standing |
Is the dismissal of the motion for leave to appeal by the New York State Court of Appeals inconsistent? |
| 19-4 |
Jackson National Life Insurance Company v. Tamarin Lindenburg, Individually and as Natural Guardian of Her Minor Children ZTL and SML |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-06-28 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
certification consistent-application-of-state-law constitutional-interpretation cooperative-federalism judicial-efficiency sixth-circuit state-law tennessee-constitution tennessee-supreme-court |
Do principles of cooperative federalism, judicial efficiency, and concern for the consistent application of state law compel the Sixth Circuit to cert… |
| 18-9442 |
Donald Loston v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-05-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-efficiency judicial-integrity reversible-error right-to-counsel sixth-amendment state-trial-court trial-court-discretion |
Whether a state trial court denial of counsel of choice is reversible error when no threat against the interest of judicial integrity and efficiency w… |