Elaine Mickman v. Richard Mickman
SocialSecurity
Does the state court violate federal law and the Constitution by depriving Equal Protection of the Law when it terminates child support by arbitrarily Age-Discriminating against minor children as '2nd Class Siblings?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Doesn’t the state Court violate federal law and the Constitution by depriving Equal Protection of the Law when it terminates child support by arbitrarily Age-Discriminating against minor children as “2nd Class Siblings” ? 2. Isn’t the Governmental Objective to reduce child welfare-dependency contravened and undermined by the state arbitrarily abusing their power | exemplified by reducing and, or, prematurely terminating child support for minors as substitution for a support-payor’s personal voluntary expenditures? 3. Doesn’t a state Court violate the Constitution and conflict with federal laws by ordering-away a Custodial Parent's fundamental Constitutional Due Process Right to prohibit filing for Child Support?