Whether the denial of an ASL interpreter for a deaf individual in a legal proceeding violates the Americans with Disabilities Act

ESTION(S) PRESENTED or (Ahenitan Sigh aagirje) Very good provided ASL interpreter year 20%-2u5 Valmont Colom bus, Medraska: year 2015 reject Ask integperlec By a “ io Wile reset on rhe Floor interpsehr Denial Mot Some Teas on or AsL inberpreloy Ques. | f) ven ' Why Val mont ereploy or Allow Ast \wherpoeter on | heey Bronheoy Tepes but why pot Vf | enial, { rob Va ipnont Lolow4ys Ne bresk, reede Texas mare leer umlonstend oo/ eVidens « Thy A policy at Celombus, webresi, Now) policy | . acest Clear. Sent +o Hones i carPionos| Rela bi ltdtien (VR) Nob rash aia After b 7202 WAY HE Dnyore? £ FE Mert asked many Hye KY JON tore? / Meangager — trey eseck Ponit 1S Judges failuye Petia 7 "> Awericans SS . on NS evidence havvas snes he tdons Disabitily Acts Lew ? ees "en Yherminete | |