No. 22-5741
Anthony Delano Hylton, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-history criminal-procedure detention-duration fourth-amendment law-enforcement-inquiry prolonged-detention rodriguez-precedent rodriguez-v-united-states traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does This Court's Decision in Rodriguez v. United States permit any criminal history inquiry at any traffic stop no matter how long the inquiry takes?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Does This Court’s Decision in Rodriguez v. United States permit any criminal history inquiry at any traffic stop no matter how long the inquiry takes? B. Does Rodriguez v. United States require a case by case analysis as to whether a traffic stop may be prolonged beyond its initial purpose in order to perform an extensive criminal history investigation? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-09-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2022)
Attorneys
Anthony Hylton
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent