No. 22-5754

Jamal Laurent v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c crime-of-violence criminal-conviction district-court insufficient-evidence joint-trial joint-trials missing-witness missing-witness-instruction rico-act rico-statute unavailable-witness warrantless-seizure witness-statement
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether RICO is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. §924(c)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether RICO is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. §924(c)? 2. Whether the district court erred when it admitted Merritt’s statements or alternatively whether it erred when it did not sever the joint trials? 3. Whether the district court erred in denying Laurent’s motion to introduce unavailable witness statements, or alternatively whether it erred in denying the requested missing witness instruction? 4. Whether there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions? 5. Whether the district court erred when it did not suppress the warrantless seizure of the handgun from Laurent’s bedroom? ii PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS The Petitioner in this Court is Jamal Laurent. The Respondent is the United States of America. iti

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2022)

Attorneys

Jamal Laurent
Bruce Robert BryanBruce R. Bryan, Esq., Petitioner
Bruce Robert BryanBruce R. Bryan, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent