| 23-5891 |
Luis Alonso Hidalgo, III v. Tim Garrett, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-10-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel joinder joint-trial sixth-amendment |
Did the Ninth Circuit err in denying Petitioner Hidalgo's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, improper joinder, and improper convictions? |
| 23-5319 |
Antoine L. Riggins v. Ken Hollibaugh, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Somerset, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-08-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brecht-exception brecht-v-abrahamson co-defendant-confession fair-trial fourteenth-amendment joint-trial sixth-amendment |
Is there an urgent need to further discuss the exception mentioned in Brecht v. Abrahamson 507 U.S. 619 (1993) where defendant's Sixth and Fourteenth … |
| 22-6553 |
Esau Ferdinand v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-01-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-1962(d) criminal-procedure enterprise-affairs enterprise-liability federal-rule-criminal-procedure-14(a) joint-trial personal-participation prosecutorial-discretion rico-conspiracy severance |
For RICO conspiracy liability, must the defendant agree to personally further the enterprise's affairs? |
| 22-5754 |
Jamal Laurent v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2022-10-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924c crime-of-violence criminal-conviction district-court insufficient-evidence joint-trial joint-trials missing-witness missing-witness-instruction rico-act rico-statute unavailable-witness warrantless-seizure witness-statement |
Whether RICO is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) |
| 21-5541 |
Dan Kenny Delva v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-08-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel joint-trial right-to-counsel severance sixth-amendment trial-severance |
Whether Mr. Delva was denied effective assistance of counsel |
| 20-6684 |
Daniel Todd Silveria v. California |
California |
2020-12-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment capital-case due-process joint-trial mitigating-evidence severance |
May a court exclude significant mitigating evidence in a capital case by joining two codefendants in a single trial before a single jury? |
| 20-5035 |
Octavius McLendon and Henry Lee Bryant v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aiding-and-abetting brady-violation constitutional-infirmity joint-trial new-trial-relief principal-conviction |
Where a Brady violation has rendered constitutionally infirm the conviction of a defendant who was alleged to be the principal in the commission of an… |
| 18-1578 |
Pfizer Inc. v. Alida Adamyan, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-06-25 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
cafa-removal civil-procedure class-action-fairness-act diversity-jurisdiction federal-court joint-trial mass-action products-liability removal state-court state-court-proposal |
Whether a state court's proposal to try jointly the claims of more than 100 plaintiffs can qualify for 'mass action' removal under the Class Action Fa… |
| 18-6909 |
Albert Andrew Lucero v. Kim Holland, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bruton-rule bruton-v-united-states co-defendant confrontation-clause confrontation-clause-rights crawford-analysis crawford-v-washington harmless-error joint-trial sixth-amendment testimonial-statement |
Was the California Court of Appeal's decision contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, this Court's jurisprudence holding that the Sixth Amendm… |
| 18-421 |
Jose Luis Cepeda-Cortes v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-10-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
co-defendant criminal-procedure extraneous-criminal-acts federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure joint-trial jury-reliability prejudice rule-14a severance spill-over-effect zafiro-v-united-states |
Does a fair and consistent application of Rule 14(a) require this Court to re-examine its decision in Zafiro and clarify the factors to be considered … |