No. 22-5821
Felipe Noriega, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure seizure traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Amendment allows a police officer to extend a concluded traffic stop based on minimal, if any, suspicious factors
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Fourth Amendment allows a police officer to extend a concluded traffic stop based on minimal, if any, suspicious factors. 2. Whether the determination of a seizure, as applied in this case, is constitutional and whether it should be or should not be. i STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Felipe Noriega
Erin Carr — Carr Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent