Is the stringent gatekeeping standard under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) consistent with AEDPA and Panetti v. Quarterman?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The questions presented are: 1. Is the stringent gatekeeping standard under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), which some circuits have applied to after-acquired Brady/Napue claims even if the exculpatory evidence was not known at the time of the initial habeas petition, consistent with AEDPA and the Court’s decision is Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 127 S.Ct. 2842, 168 L.Ed.2d 662 (2007). i