| 24-7111 |
Jeffrey G. Hutchinson v. Florida |
Florida |
2025-05-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
competency-to-be-executed cross-examination due-process ford-v-wainwright panetti-v-quarterman procedural-fairness |
Whether Panetti creates a heightened standard of due process compared to Ford's controlling holding, and whether due process requires additional proce… |
| 23-5819 |
Jason Green v. Warren L. Montgomery, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-10-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
clearly-established-federal-law clearly-established-law due-process forum-shopping habeas-corpus judicial-fairness lockyer-v-andrade ninth-circuit-review panetti-v-quarterman prosecutorial-misconduct |
Did the Ninth Circuit take an inappropriately narrow view of what constitutes clearly established federal law in conflict with this Court's treatment … |
| 23-5243 |
Johnny Johnson v. David Vandergriff, Warden |
Missouri |
2023-07-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-punishment due-process eighth-amendment evidentiary-hearing ford-v-wainwright habeas-corpus mental-competency panetti-v-quarterman procedural-fairness |
Whether a report from a qualified neuropsychiatrist that a condemned prisoner is incompetent for execution that is not contradicted by any qualified e… |
| 22-600 |
Gregory Bartko v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-12-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
aedpa aedpa-standard brady-claim brady-rule exculpatory-evidence gatekeeping-standard habeas-corpus napue-claim napue-rule panetti-v-quarterman |
Is the stringent gatekeeping standard under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) consistent with AEDPA and Panetti v. Quarterman? |
| 22-5848 |
Benjamin Robert Cole v. Jim Farris, Warden |
Oklahoma |
2022-10-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
death-row disputed-issues-of-fact eighth-amendment execution-competency ford-v-wainwright fourteenth-amendment panetti-v-quarterman procedural-safeguards state-court warden-gatekeeper |
Whether it violates the Eighth Amendment and this Court's decisions in Ford v. Wainwright and Panetti v. Quarterman, for a state court to bypass proce… |
| 21-7829 |
Clarence Wayne Dixon v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment competency-to-be-executed eighth-amendment execution-standard mental-competency mental-illness non-bizarre-delusions panetti-precedent panetti-v-quarterman schizophrenia |
Does Panetti v. Quarterman foreclose a schizophrenic prisoner from demonstrating that non-bizarre delusions obstruct his rational understanding of the… |
| 19-1209 |
Thomas Edward Nesbitt v. Scott Frakes |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-04-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
actual-innocence aedpa appellate-review castro-v-us constitutional-rights due-process habeas habeas-corpus non-successiveness panetti-v-quarterman procedural-safeguards |
Does the Appellate Court's obscure Panel denials violate the 1996 A.E.D.P.A. Constitutional Due Process Question in Conflict with the Certiorari Decis… |
| 19-5839 |
Randall Wayne Mays v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-09-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
competency cruel-and-unusual-punishment death-penalty delusions due-process eighth-amendment ford-hearing junk-science lay-stereotypes mental-competency mental-illness panetti-v-quarterman |
Whether a state court may rely on junk science and lay stereotypes of the severely mentally ill to adjudicate a Ford claim |
| 18-9751 |
Thomas Edward Nesbitt v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-06-21 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence aedpa brady-violation castro-v-us constitutional-rights due-process habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance non-successiveness panetti-v-quarterman |
Does the Appellate Court's obscure Panel denials violate the 1996 A.E.D.P.A. Constitutional Due Process question in conflict with the Certiorari decis… |
| 18-9372 |
Quisi Bryan v. Tim Shoop, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-05-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
aedpa constitutional-interpretation federal-constitutional-law federal-review federalism habeas-corpus panetti-v-quarterman procedural-bar retroactive-law retroactivity state-court |
Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244 prevents a federal habeas court from reviewing a state court's voluntary and independent retroactive application of a new rul… |
| 18-7212 |
Anthony Ray Dailey v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-01-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 castro-v-united-states certificate-of-appealability collateral-review habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-review panetti-v-quarterman procedural-due-process retroactivity second-and-successive-petitions section-2255 supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-mathis |
Whether the U.S. District and Appellate Courts violated Castro v. United States, 124 S.Ct., by refusing to issue a Certificate of Appealability |
| 18-6470 |
In Re Gary Malone |
|
2018-10-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2244(b) actual-innocence civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process federal-court-procedure habeas-corpus mcquiggin-v-perkins miscarriage-of-justice panetti-v-quarterman standing successive-petition successive-petitions |
Whether a single district court and circuit court judge can entertain a second successive 2254(b) petition when the second application is a continuati… |