No. 22-6061
Kyle Watkins v. Sean Medeiros, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights cumulative-effect due-process first-degree-murder habeas habeas-corpus law-enforcement law-enforcement-practices prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Court can construe Brady's prejudice prong so strictly that it becomes, in effect, an automatic means of excusing unconstitutional law enforcement practices
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In a habeas case involving a first degree murder conviction, whether a Court can construe Brady's prejudice prong so strictly that it becomes, in effect, an automatic means of excusing unconstitutional law enforcement practices.
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-15
Waiver of right of respondent Sean Medeiros to respond filed.
2022-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2022)
2022-10-27
Application (22A347) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until November 14, 2022.
2022-10-24
Application (22A347) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 2, 2022 to November 14, 2022, submitted to Justice Jackson.
Attorneys
Kyle Watkins
Sean Medeiros
Anna E. Lumelsky — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent